Talk:Foundation of the Communist Party of India
Latest comment: 5 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Foundation of the Communist Party of India appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 May 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that within the Indian communist movement there is a dispute on whether the Communist Party of India (flag pictured) was founded in Tashkent in 1920 or Kanpur in 1925?
- Source: Kiran Saxena (1990). Trade Union Movement and the National Movement. South Asian Publishers. p. 128. ISBN 978-81-7003-116-1.
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 380 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Soman (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: This is a very nicely-written and well-researched article, with quite the interesting hook for DYK. Excellent work on this! Only real issue is that it's currently tagged as an orphan, this can be remedied by linking to this article from at least one other article. Ping me once this is done and I'll be happy to approve this. (I'm also not convinced that the picture is necessary for this kind of a hook, but its inclusion is up to the DYK coordinators) Grnrchst (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Grnrchst:, many thanks, no longer orphaned. --Soman (talk) 22:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Fabulous, thanks. Approved. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)