Talk:Fortune Playhouse

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elizabethan theatre (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elizabethan theatre, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elizabethan theatreWikipedia:WikiProject Elizabethan theatreTemplate:WikiProject Elizabethan theatreElizabethan theatre articles

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Mid‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Fortune Playhouse appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Edward Alleyn had to form a partnership with twelve others to meet the £1,000 cost to rebuild the Fortune Playhouse in London after it burned down in 1621?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/March.

Wikipedia

Starting Split process

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This page created, all refs to Fortune Theatre will be modified to Fortune Playhouse. Details on historic playhouse will be removed from modern article, when task is complete. Kbthompson 11:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

doneKbthompson 12:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replicas???

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

All Wikipedia discussions of Tudor and Stuart theaters should avoid the word "replica," as we don't know what they looked like. Even Peter Streete's contract for the Fortune gives only crucial dimensions, not actual plans. BTW: though Eliz. name spelling veered all over the lot, I think the modern convention has the builder as "Streete," with an extra e.Jim Stinson 20:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's seriously misleading to caption the photo "OSF Elizabethan Stage, based on the dimensions of the Fortune." The article on the Oregon Shakespeare Festival says, "The result is not an exact replica of the Fortune Theatre. The known but incomplete dimensions apply only to the stage. The original specifications sometimes say no more than "to be built like the Globe," for which there are no plans or details." Amen to that. I've attended several Shakespeare performances at the OSF. Though the stage and stage house reflect pretty much what we know (or surmise) about Elizabethan/Stuart theaters in general, the rest of the theater is utterly unlike them. (BTW, this theater nonetheless offers an excellent Shakespearean experience.) Suggest re-captioning the photo,"Parts of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival stage are based on some of the Dimensions in the original builder's contract for the Fortune."Jim Stinson (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can somebody find a picture of it?

Unless new sources have turned up since 1961, there are no contemporary representations of the Fortune.Jim Stinson 20:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

E. K. Chambers

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the list of references, E. K[erchever] Chambers's name has been garbled to make "E. K. Kerchever". The standard form is "E. K. Chambers". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.152.4.169 (talk) 11:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fixed; thanks for noticing. --Old Moonraker (talk) 16:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic