Talk:Firozabad rail collision
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Extorc in topic Requested move 5 June 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Firozabad rail collision article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cause of accident? edit
What was the cause of the accident? Firozpur (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 5 June 2023 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 14:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Firozabad rail disaster → 1995 Firozabad rail collision – per WP:DISASTER: "Try to avoid the words disaster, tragedy and crisis because this characterization is too subjective. It is preferable to use specific event names, such as collision, collapse, explosion, outbreak, pandemic, sinking, oil spill, and the like. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- I support as per nominator. MrAnmol (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
- Unless reliable sources consistently refer to this as a disaster, I support calling this a collision. However, I don't think it's necessary to include the year in the title. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 20:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.