Talk:Fazilka

India: Punjab / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added the pind/Farm village section If anyone wants to add there pind/ write a history on it please do so. I only know of Kandwala's history and that too to a limited extent 0=po=[p — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.205.36.245 (talk) 09:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fazilka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080820022348/http://arrivesafe.org/ecocab_india.php to http://www.arrivesafe.org/ecocab_india.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Fazilka/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article needs huge amount of cleanup.

References on section title line does not look good. There should be inline citations. What is that first reference? A book? An website? or those two guys told/added it here? Images were too big. Resized and replaced them for now. Texts and alignment/wikilink etc. needs to be looked at.

Overall, it needs a lot of polishing. GDibyendu (talk) 16:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 16:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 15:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic