Talk:Fatso the Fat-Arsed Wombat

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

I was under the impression the correct name was Fatso the Big-Arsed Wombat, not 'fat-arsed.'

Non-Existent Wikilinks edit

Please don't ruin an already bad piece by created Wikilinks for every word - this is ridiculous. If it re-appears in this form I will vfd it. The curate's egg 14:11, 7 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

No pictures? How can you have a mascot article without a picture? 80.6.122.234 18:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

More edit

It's definitely 'fat-arsed', as vulgar/funny as that is! As for pics, that's a great idea, let's see what we can find, copyright stuff in mind. (Westius 05:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC))Reply

Picture edit

We need a picture of the Fatso sculpture outside the Olympic (Telstra) stadium! He is standing on top of a pole, along with all the poles inscribed with the volunteer's names, between the Novatel and the stadium. Someone can take a photo and release it under the GFDL.John Dalton 08:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I passed this on to a photography forum I frequent, and someone kindly got a couple of pictures of fatso, and is happy for me to pass them on under the GFDL. Would I need this person's real name etc. or is it sufficient that these pictures are known to have been released under the GFDL by the photographer? Cheers Systemdown1 04:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ideally get the person to write a statement saying they agree to release the photos under the GNU Free Documentation License and add the text of the statement to the image's page. Better still get them to create an account (or do it for them) and they can upload the photo themself (along with the I the author... GFDL tag). I've seen some people objecting to an image being uploaded alogn with a note "This is Bob's image and he said I could upload it", it seems a statement from the author/photographer is preferable. Thanks for organising the photo!John Dalton 08:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Actually, the photographer has published the pic under the cc-by-sa 2.0 license see here, which I hadn't noticed previously. It seems Wikimedia Commons will accept images under this license. Is this pic okay? Can it be uploaded to Commons? Systemdown1 07:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure it would be okay, so go ahead and upload it. If anyone has any objections, they can raise them in response to the uploading. I think the general rule with Wikipedia is if you genuinely think it is okay and a useful contribution go ahead and do it. You don't have to ask permission of anyone. If people disagree with your actions, they will tell you. The important thing is not to be bloody minded about it and continue to do something if lots of people are objecting.
I prefer the angle of the shot in the SMH article, so I might still try to get another shot of Fatso from that angle. Please do upload the image you have found though! John Dalton 01:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Picture added to article. There is a "behind" view here, but it's probably not as good as the side view that I've added to the article. The photographer says he'll be trying to get some better shots in better conditions, so we may have some better pictures soon. Systemdown1 04:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

By the way, the original Fatso is now housed in a glass case in Kerry Stokes's North Sydney office[1]. Anyone reckon they can get a picture of that?! John Dalton 12:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Where is the Second Fatso? edit

Anyone know what happened to the second Fasto? Stokes bought one. Where is the other? John Dalton 06:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Stamp edit

I'm pretty sure the stamp Fatso appeared on was the Australia Post "Australian Gold Medalist" series with the Men's 4x200m Freestyle Relay Swimming team, being held by Michael Klim, second person from the right. It was a 45 cent stamp, one of the ones that was produced within 24 hours of the event. Does anyone have a stamp to verify it? Could a scan be uploaded under fair use? John Dalton 05:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use allows stamps only for purpose of illustrating the stamp itself, not just the subject of the stamp. But as this article does discuss the stamp itself I think that using it here would qualify under fair use. - Waza 20:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fatso the Fat-Arsed Wombat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Fatso the Fat-Arsed Wombat/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I assessed the quality as "start" class because the article is not broken into clear sections and doesn't leave a reader with a really thorough understanding of Fatso. However, given the amount of information on Fatso available externally, I think the article does a good job and is well referenced. —midg3t 11:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 11:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

New Fatso Statue to be Commissioned edit

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/how-roy-hg-and-fatso-the-fat-arsed-wombat-stole-the-show-in-sydney-2000-20200814-p55lu4.html

The story also includes other information that can be worked into the article.