Removal of the Copy Edit Tag

edit
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fate/Extra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fate/Extra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


Create separate article for Fate/Extra CCC

edit

I don't quite understand why this hasn't been done yet, but Fate/Extra CCC is an entirely different game (effectively, if not chronologically, a sequel), with a differing story, characters, and even crew. It shouldn't redirect here; I don't see a reason for a new article for CCC not to be made.

To begin with, this article is completely devoid of CCC-related information, and any attempt to blend the two incompatible games would end up in a mess. I'll start work on a new article if no one is opposed to this. ManaDragon (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Fate/Extra Last Project" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fate/Extra Last Project and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Fate/Extra Last Project until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 05:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply