Talk:Fablehaven

Expand article

My son loves this book. Any more info, particularly when the second one comes out will be just nifty. Travb (talk) 03:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

the 2nd one is out--65.54.97.195 13:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Just Fine

The article fine just the way it is now. --Anonymus

I like it!

I agree!! Jibajabba 12:51, 16 June 2007

Actually, this article is full of problems.

The article seems to be written by a particularly literate child. I mean that literally. The descriptions of events in the books are unfocused and spend more time focused on minute incident than the overall plot, without regard to relevance or clarity.

An encyclopedia entry is not the proper place to be listing trivial detail. Where is the discussion of themes and analysis? Of charecterization? Of sales and distribution?

Worse yet, in describing a work of juvenile (as in the genre, not the quality) fantasy, an entire article passes without mentioning that the work is juvenile fantasy. That's a huge oversight.

the egoist —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.45.144 (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hopefully the recent revisions are satisfactory. Check it out! --Rgpassey (talk) 17:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Just Added

I recently added a bit of information to Fablehaven. It shows not as much information on the books indivudualy, but more on the series as a whole. Check it out! If anyone has enough time to add summaries on the first two that would be great, but not needed.

(Brownwiki 20:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC))

Wikiproject

I've Proposed Wikiproject:Fablehaven, if you would like to make it a Wikiproject Just go to Wikipedia:WikiProject, scroll down and click on , WikiProject proposal, go down to Wikiproject:Fablehaven, and put your name under Interested Wikipedians.

Thanks

--Jabba78 (talk) 15:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Can't seem to find it. Are you sure you put it on the list?

--Rgpassey (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, found it, and here's the link:

This user is a participant in WikiProject Fablehaven.

--Rgpassey (talk) 17:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments on Current Status

I feel like the Fablehaven Wiki has reached a status of - very well done. It is organized, professional, and accurately informational. Thanks to everyone who has positively contributed to this project. I'm looking forward to the release of future Fablehaven books so we can make the updates here. Happy Reading!

--Rgpassey (talk) 22:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Does anyone know why the images of the books were taken off the main page? Was it a copyright issue? They really added to the overall presentation. I'd like to have them put back. Please comment here if you are aware of some rule that prohibits it.

--Rgpassey (talk) 22:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Reception Section.

The Reception Section is not very good. The first four sentences are fine, the rest looks like it comes right off the back cover of the book. Most of the section probably needs to be deleted and redone from scratch. 205.118.82.145 (talk) 20:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome to edit it. --Rgpassey (talk) 14:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Addition of ISBN from Wikidata

Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to {{Infobox book}} as a result of this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ Rob^Talk 01:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fablehaven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813180555/http://deseretbook.com:80/item/4961111/Fablehaven to http://deseretbook.com/item/4961111/Fablehaven
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://archive.columbiatribune.com/2006/nov/20061116life001.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110627053504/http://www.bookreview.com:80/$spindb.query.listreview2.booknew.15578 to http://www.bookreview.com/$spindb.query.listreview2.booknew.15578

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fablehaven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090813180555/http://deseretbook.com/item/4961111/Fablehaven to http://deseretbook.com/item/4961111/Fablehaven
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170414163750/http://archive.columbiatribune.com/2006/nov/20061116life001.asp to http://archive.columbiatribune.com/2006/nov/20061116life001.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Fablehaven.jpg

File:Fablehaven.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Fablehaven

This sounds like a good but I don’t know? Please tell me. 146.71.66.164 (talk) 01:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you!

This article was so wonderfully written, clear and concise! Just wanted to extend my thanks. 75.192.195.154 (talk) 01:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)