Proposed merger edit

M249 Squad Automatic Weapon appears to contain a lot of generic information about the Minimi, that belongs or is duplicated here. I don't believe there is enough M249 SAW-specific information in that article for it to stand alone after merger. M249 SAW should be a section of this article and M249 Squad Automatic Weapon should redirect here. Yorkshire Phoenix (talk) 11:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

For i totaly agree. if it isnt merged it proves that for aevery varaint there hs too be a artical. also i think weapons should be named what ther original manufactur called them(Esskater11)

I second the opinon.Paulwharton, 21:14PM, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

  • I agree. I'm going to rewrite the entire article with a nice development and technical description and will list the M249 as one of its many variants. Koalorka 20:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
    • FOR - I did the merge but it was reverted because of "lack of consent" (even though it had been proposed with little opposition several times. I'll need your support to merge the two articles on the Talk:M249 Squad Automatic Weapon page. Koalorka 05:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • FOR -- However please let the tags play themselves out. There was a legitemate objection that the M249 was significantly different, however I believe that FN markets the M249 as the MINIMI interchangeably. --Asams10 11:30, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • AGAINST - You'll lose too much specific info on the M249. D.E. Watters 20:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • AGAINST - For the same reasons as I oppose the merger of the M240 and FN MAG articles. The systems are marketed different, have spawned separate variant lines, and the history of the M249 and its adoption is too much for the article on the FN Minimi. They have separate histories and in many ways separate developments. I understand the reasonable logic for a merge, but I agree with Daniel Watters here that you will lose a lot of important information if you treat them as the same and leave out the important history. -- Thatguy96 15:49, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

CETME Ameli edit

If the CETME Ameli was fitted with a magazine insert under the belt feed insert, Will it be more advanced then the Minimi?.User:EX STAB, 19:50PM, 2nd April 2007 (UTC)

What is your definition of advanced? Koalorka (talk) 08:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Light machine gun vs. Squad automatic weapon edit

It says that the M-249/FN MINIMI is a light machine gun but I would think that it is a squad automatic weapon.(Kind of self explanatory in the US Army designation M-249 SAW.) King Toast 11:38, December 30, 2007 (UTC)

"Squad Automatic Weapon" is a US designation for what is known universally as a light machine gun. Koalorka (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

The weapon that inspired the MINIMI? edit

Does anyone know if it's true that the MINIMI was modelled/inspired by the Stoner 63 weapon system? 121.218.25.164 (talk) 10:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

All weapons are at least partly inspired by all prior known weapons... however in this case I can say that the one wasn't inspired by the other. This is not a forum, by the way. This page is meant for discussion of the article. --Asams10 (talk) 15:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

MINIMI or Minimi? edit

This is short for, Minimitrailleuse, correct? So, why is it in all caps? We had the discussion on GLOCK vs. Glock and Glock won, correct? So, why is MINIMI like it is? I'll give it a week for discussion and move the page. Any comments? --Asams10 (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Because it is an abbreviation. GLOCK is not, and was simply corporate marketing. Koalorka (talk) 02:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's an abbreviation, yes, but abbreviations are not all capitalized. Is there a Wikipedia standard for this? --Asams10 (talk) 02:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do we start calling the M2HB the M2hb now? Is there a standard against it? Koalorka (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, no, because the abbreviation "HB" stands for Heavy Barrel. However, the letters in "MINIMI" do not each stand for something. I don't know if there is a standard for or against it... was hoping somebody from the Wikipedia CABAL might jump in and lay down the law... or is that Cabal? --Asams10 (talk) 02:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't really see it that way. MINIMI is both an abbreviation of an actual word and a correct marketing name used by FN. I had the same dilemma with the AMELI LMG. This is to indicate to non-native speakers who would probably assume it is the full name that there is another extended meaning behind both names. Koalorka (talk) 02:35, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The articles that might apply are Wikipedia:Capitalization, Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters), and Abbreviation. --Asams10 (talk) 02:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I did check those out and didn't find anything relevant. It just states that we should not over capitalize and I think I made a decent case for the MINIMI name. Koalorka (talk) 03:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I did note the Interpol example. That's the closest I could come to support the "Minimi" variation. --Asams10 (talk) 03:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Minimi 7.62 edit

Along with the images the FN reps sent me a PDF spec sheet of their new 7.62 Minimi. I don't believe it's published yet, so I can't really cite it, but that is where I obtained the performance data. Just an FYI. Koalorka (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Images removed edit

Looks like my email exchange with the FN reps did not meet Commons requirements, the images were all removed by an admin and I was threatened with a block. I don't know how I can be more clear about the consent. I sent them a request with licensing information, they responded by sending me the photographs.... I can't be more clear than that. I've given up right now, they've even removed the Izhmash images from waay back. Koalorka (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Georgian Army edit

Since the GAF is training togheter with the Swedish Armed forces, Georgia received an unknow amount of FN Minimis in the past two years.

This needs to be cited. Koalorka (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Open Bolt edit

Quote from article: "The Minimi fires from an open bolt, which reduces the danger of a round cooking off after extended periods of continuous fire, since a cartridge is only momentarily introduced into the chamber prior to ignition, and the movement of the bolt and bolt carrier forces air through the chamber and barrel after each shot, ventilating the barrel and removing heat."

I don't think the last part of this statement referring to ventilation is entirely correct. Open bolt operation does not enable, and is not linked to, the movement of the bolt carrier/bolt to force air through the barrel. Reciprocating parts...erm...reciprocate whether the weapon fires from an open or closed bolt and so would move air in the same manner. It would be more correct to say that firing from an open bolt enables better cooling and ventilation because the working parts remain to the rear between bursts. The open breech enables air movement through the barrel and around the breech, which would not occur to the same extent if the working parts were forward. Strangways (talk) 15:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.army-technology.com/contractors/machine_guns/fnherstal/press32.html
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:48, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on FN Minimi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on FN Minimi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on FN Minimi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply