Talk:Expansion (sculpture)

Add topic
Active discussions

Did you know nominationEdit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 19:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC).

  • The artist has uploaded an image - so I have included it here Bruxton (talk) 01:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  Interesting sculpture, on fine sources, no copyvio obvious. I am not happy with the first hook, thinking that the intentional cracking is the more interesting aspect. Can you add the illuminating from within to it, in an ALT2? First or not doesn't matter so much if too long mentioning that. In the article, I think publications should be italic, no? Also please add (pictured) to hooks. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the review @Gerda Arendt:! I rewrote to add the bit about the illumination. I was not sure about the use of punctuation, but a semicolon seems appropriate in that sentence. Bruxton (talk) 14:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
ALT2: ... that sculptor Paige Bradley broke her Expansion sculpture on purpose; and with the pieces she created what is thought to be the first bronze sculpture to be illuminated from within? Bruxton (talk) 14:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
  Thank you! Perhaps we could drop the "first" and rather speak of the light through the cracks, - up to you. The image is licensed, and speaks volumes. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)