Talk:Exercise TROPEX

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic GA Review
Former good article nomineeExercise TROPEX was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 28, 2017Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 3, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that TROPEX 2017 witnessed participation of forty-five major surface combatants, five submarines, and 50 aircraft from the Indian Navy's Western and Eastern Naval Command?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Exercise TROPEX/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 00:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • @MBlaze Lightning: Before I go into deeper comments. Here is my first take on the article. The lead needs significant expansion, aptly summarizing all the prose of the body. Secondly, there is needs to be a section explaining what was the history behind conduction of the these exercises. Some context is required on what led to conduction on these in the first place. Also try to get some information on the exercises of 2008, 2011, and why the exercise was not conducted in 2016. Also the article needs significant work to comply with the Manual of Style. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • @MBlaze Lightning: Pinging again. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:08, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Thanks for reviewing this article and for the ping, but unfortunately, I won't be able to work on this article for a while. So I'm afraid you will have to close this GA Review. I'll be sure to let you know if I renominate it again. Thanks. —MBL Talk 15:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply