Talk:Evelyn de Rothschild

Requested move 13 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as proposed by Necrothesp. There is enough of a consensus that the more recent banker is primary for Evelyn de Rothschild, and I'll move the earlier one to Evelyn de Rothschild (born 1886). The disambig page is no longer needed per WP:TWODABS.  — Amakuru (talk) 18:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

---

Evelyn Robert de Rothschild → Evelyn de Rothschild – His middle name does not seem to be widely used; the Telegraph does not use it, and neither does the BBC. Ideally his title would be included, since it is part of his name and he is commonly referred to by it, but Wikipedia policy disallows that for some reason. Zacwill (talk) 17:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

• Comment: the proposed title, Evelyn de Rothschild is a disambiguation page with one other article. To delete it, we'd need to see evidence that this is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the name.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Then I say the title should be Sir Evelyn de Rothschild. It makes more sense to use his title for disambiguation (which as I have said is widely used) than one of his middle names. Zacwill (talk) 17:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
• Support as clear primary topic. And rename the other one, a much more minor character, to Evelyn de Rothschild (born 1886), the standard disambiguator in these circumstances, with a hatnote on this article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Net worth figure seems wrong / poorly sourced

We source the $20 billion number to "TheRichest.com" - which does not cite methodology or sources and which, I believe, exists mainly as SEO bait. In any event, the site gives no evidence for the assertion. Contrary evidence is mainly of the negative variety - the famous Forbes magazine list when searched for Rothschild does not list him, nor is he in the top 20 of the Sunday Times Rich List 2016. I'm not a subscriber, so I can't see where they do list him. As far as I can tell, it's very popular in anti-semitic circles to radically overestimate the wealth of the (quite large) Rothschild family as being in the trillions, and I can only assume that the numbers floating around the Internet were taken in by TheRichest.com. (I am not accusing them of bias, just of sloppy research.)

I won't make the edit myself out of an abundance of caution regarding COI issues - I've met Evelyn de Rothschild once. (He didn't inquire or mention his Wikipedia entry, and it was years ago.)--Jimbo Wales (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

COI issues are a hot topic at the moment, very wise Jimbo. -Roxy the dog™ bark 19:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

• Removed for discussion here as per WP:BLP , diff weakly cited and disputed in this chat. Govindaharihari (talk) 19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evelyn de Rothschild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130506142001/http://news.sky.com/story/628428/i-love-my-country-over-my-party to http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Obama-Must-Convince-Clinton-Loyalists---Lynn-Forester-de-Rothschild-And-Betsy-Myers-Give-A-View/Article/200808415087396?lpos=World_News_Article_Related_Content_Region_9&lid=ARTICLE_15087396_Obama_Must_Convince_Clinton_Loyalists_-_Lynn_Forester_de_Rothschild_And_Betsy_Myers_Give_A_View

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 25 September 2017 (UTC)