This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
A sourced quotation in the AA dismissal section infringes on the Avoid Victimization rule by providing too much detail, giving over emphasis to the conflict and jeopardizing neutrality WP:AVOIDVICTIM. The quote was removed. Oikoumenikos2 (talk)
Disagree. WP:AVOIDVICTIM applies when "writing about a person noteworthy only for one or two events". In my opinion, the Franch article establishes noteworthiness over a wide range of events, and to not give reasons for her dismissal raises more questions than it answers. Quote reinstated. Paul W (talk) 22:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The newly added Quotes section does not fit with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Apart from attribution to Franch, their relevance is unclear - see WP:Quotes about quotations needing to be pertinent, with relevance explained. Also it says specifically "Avoid stand-alone quote sections; use Wikiquote instead" [emphasis added]. I think this should be deleted. Paul W (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi Paul W, I couldn't find how the Quotes section doesn't fit into the MoS. Franch is a public figure who is known for her quips, so a section of notable examples is warranted. I saw that the Hans Ulrich Obrist page has a Quotes section, so decided to add one here. Both Obrist and Franch are curators and public figures. Oikoumenikos2 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I may have slightly misled you in talking generally about the MoS, but did you read WP:Quotes? Where is the reliable source that says she "is known for her quips"? And just because another article has a Quotes section (in fact, just one) does not make it relevant to this article (see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS). Paul W (talk) 22:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
