This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
The article Ernst Gehrcke says without qualification that "he discovered anode rays". I do not dispute this because I have not a clue about the matter, but it sits uncomfortably with the article "Anode Rays", which does not mention Gehrcke, but does refer to Goldstein, Wein, and even J.J.Thompson. I would contribute, but it is so far out of my field that it would take too long to be worth while. Comments, anyone?JonRichfield (talk) 11:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Folks, this claim has been in the article since 2009. I asked for assistance in 2011. No support is offered for his right to the distinction, in spite of references in the Anode rays article to Crookes and others working on anode rays twenty years earlier, and doing quantitative investigations ten years earlier, than Gehrcke's "discovery" in 1908. Either someone offers adequate details and justifications together with accessible citations, or I shall soon delete these claims, which, as things stand, all sound like buncomb to me. JonRichfield (talk) 11:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
