Talk:Ernst Achenbach

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mistake (he was opposed to prosecution of war criminals!)

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You got it wrong. You write: "Although he had been a member of the Nazi Party, he advocated the condemnation of the German war criminals, something which led to a scandal in 1970 when he initially failed to make it as a Commissioner in the European Economic Community because of public pressure."

Actually he was opposed to prosecution of (any) Nazi perpetrators. (For a while he was quite active campaigning for an amnesty, but he also used obstruction.) That of course was what led to the scandal. Greetings, 80.104.217.153 (talk) 13:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I also found this sentence to be nonsensical, as he actively campaigned for the amnesty for all war criminals. I'd like to eit it unless there are objections. I assume this is just an error in translation. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Falkenhausen acquitted?

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article says he successfully defended Alexander von Falkenhausen against war crime charges but the article on Falkenhausen says Falkenhausen was convicted.

It can't be both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.119.204.117 (talk) 14:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic