Talk:Ernest Saunders

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 81.155.53.143 in topic A medical miracle

PoV edit

Reverted a major edit by Newshounder -- it was not explained. Some changes may be factual corrections but much seems to bowdlerize facts in the article to make it more favourable to the subject. Further editing may be useful if some explanation can be given for changes. --mervyn 08:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Earnestsaunders.jpg edit

 

Image:Earnestsaunders.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 06:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Who? edit

Presumably this applies to Lord Justice Neill "A DTI report described him as a man who did "unjustifiable favours for friends and himself"."

A medical miracle edit

This man apparently made a full recovery from an incurable condition. Why is there no fuller medical explanation?

The article should also make it clearer that the man is a convicted criminal (a "crook" as the Americans would say). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.155.145.170 (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have heard the word "crook" used in England. I see your point, however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.53.143 (talk) 19:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Lyons also had the same problem, bad health. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.53.143 (talk) 17:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply