Talk:Epitaph One

DVDs

Last night I watched the "Epitaph One" DVD commentary which provides a lot of useful information to improve this article with. Behold, there will be edits to come.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 10:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Flashforwards

I believe it should be flashbacks, not flashforwards. Although these are flashforwards to future events in the timeline of the show, from the perspective of the episode itself they are flashbacks. As this article is about the episode, not the whole show, it should be written for the scope of the episode only. Therefore, flashbacks is more accurate and more appropriate.124.182.189.117 (talk) 11:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

References

I have removed the references improve tag added last yr in July. The article has been updated and has significantly more sources than it did when it first went up.Meowies (talk) 07:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Airing in the US

I've seen lots of different sources saying that Epitaph One was not aired in the United States. This is not true. I had my DirecTV DVR set to record Dollhouse and it recorded Epitaph One on Fox (my local affiliate being WSJV out of South Bend & Elkhart, IN), I believe before the airing of the second season. However, I'm not sure of the exact date as I have since deleted the episode. If anyone else has more information or specifics, it would be nice to get this cleared up.

66.249.234.97 (talk) 16:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)JL

Detail in plot summary

Can we please remove the "This article's plot summary may be too long or excessively detailed" box at the top of the article? Having just watched the episode and immediately read the summary, it is not over-long at all: it's exactly as long as it needs to be in order adequately summarise and explain an unusually dense and complex episode. (I'd have removed the box myself if I knew how.) MirkMeister (talk) 21:29, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

I once tried to remove it some 5 months after someone put up the tag. It was instantly reverted and rather get into some edit war or discuss it with someone who clearly was more of a maintenance person I left it alone. If there is a consensus by those who have watched the show and know the complexities of the episode it really should have been removed a long time ago. My edit in question is here. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Epitaph_One&oldid=333057809 Meowies (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, can you just try it again? Maybe by this time the Plot Nazi will have moved on to some other area. MirkMeister (talk) 23:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

OK, no problem, I found it -- it was the <<plot|date=July 2009>> magic tag right at the top of the article. I've removed it. If anyone wants to put it back, please explain why rather than just blindly reverting. MirkMeister (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epitaph One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716073932/http://www.singtel-ustv.com/content/epitaph-one to http://www.singtel-ustv.com/content/epitaph-one

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)