This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This article focusses on the 1907 version of the stories by Bryant, which does seem to have been pretty racist (I've not seen it, but googled a couple of illustrations - aweful!) But the stories themselves originate in the black community, and therefore can't be racist per se. I have the version by Eve Merriam, which is relatively harmless, though still by a white author. We need a rather more differentiating account here; and possibly the article should just be called "Epaminondas (folk tales)", with sections on original stories, the Bryant version, the Merriam version, etc. --Doric Loon (talk) 20:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Agreed; it's a little disconcerting that both this article and that of Constance Egan have existed for over a decade, each presenting this notion of her writings having been problematic and offensive, and never reworked to give sources or a more balanced appraisal in line with your points above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.64.232 (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
OK, well two years on that suggestion hasn't attracted a lot of attention, but the one IP user who commented agrees, so I will make the move now, and make a first start on the content shortly. Doric Loon (talk) 19:32, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}