| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 comment edit
Where to start? Where was this article cut and pasted from? somebody's term paper? it clearly wasn't originally written for wikipedia. (e.g. "see separate handout") Are there copyright issues? A lot of the language is POV. For example:
"The ADD uses a slippery slope argument (see separate handout) that amounts to coercion on Elizabeth and others like her to accept their fate despite the hardships that living causes them. A quality of life approach would reply to these groups that it is up to individuals to decide their own quality of life and to coerce them into living is to violate a constitutionally guaranteed right to self-determination."
Byset 21:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I excised some of the worst parts, will edit more later.. Byset 21:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Ableism edit
This page is ableist because it doesn’t record the fact that the disabled community opposed Bouvia’s starvation. I tried to add that information & the edits were immediately deleted. 2601:18C:505:2890:292C:C887:FE81:6D10 (talk) 22:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)