Talk:El Modena High School

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Deli nk in topic Notable Alumnae

In the news edit

The school's principle has recently been in the news, and there has already been some vandalism of the article. If the vandalism continues, this article should probably be semi-protected.

For the next couple of weeks, I would suggest adding nothing to the article. Remember, the Wikipedia is NOT Wikinews. Once there is a clearer picture of the details, then it can be decided if the information is noteworthy enough to be included in the school's article. BlankVerse 08:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

-Removed mention of the principle from Notable Alumni. He did not attend EMHS. If you want to mention him, it should be under a different category. 216.100.92.40 19:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why was edit marked "BLP"? edit

RE: "Faculty Convicted of Registrable Sex Offenses" The inclusion of several faculty involved in sex offense convictions within a short period of time (6 years) justifies the inclusion of the individuals involved. As far as I know, all four people are still living, but any inference to their names was done in conjunction with proper citation format as mandated by Wikipedia's strict citation protocols. There was nothing biographical nor even editorial with regard to all individuals cited. Please remove the tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.139.35 (talk) 21:13, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notable Alumnae edit

I think both Bradley Thompson ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Thompson ) and Kim Stanley Robinson ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Stanley_Robinson#Awards ) should definitely be added to the notable alumnae section.Dogmo1001 (talk) 19:14, 26 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Here are a few possible alumni that I removed from the list that need references before being added back in. Deli nk (talk) 12:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Should section on faculty sex offenders be removed? edit

I'm sure that El Modena doesn't have a lock on faculty members committing sex offenses against students, and adding such a section should be taken out. This is not to minimize the issue, but I'm sure many high schools have had such criminals. I'm not going to take it out, but I think if we have a bunch of people agree here, then it could be removed by consensus. In my opinion this sensationalizes an issue that detracts from the efforts put out by the faculty and parent teacher association in moving forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.218.63.58 (talk) 07:57, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply