Talk:Egyptian Theatre (DeKalb, Illinois)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Meowist in topic GA Pass
Former good articleEgyptian Theatre (DeKalb, Illinois) was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 11, 2007Good article nomineeListed
December 1, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 11, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article

Six? edit

The theater is one of only six what remaining in the US? Theaters? Egyptian Theaters? --Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thought it was obvious because of the previous sentence and the context, but I added the word Egyptian anyway. I mean six theatres in the US, come on now. Happy Editing.A mcmurray 02:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Haha I know it didn't mean there are only 6 theatres, but that is exactly what it appeared to mean. It could also have been referring to an intervening sentence that had since been cut out (like, about it having a unique organ or something.)--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 17:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Egyptian Theatre, Coos Bay, Oregon, 1925. Is the 7th. should it read "...it is believed to be only one of a few remaining in the United States"?12.145.73.51 18:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I like that wording much better.A mcmurray 19:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tone edit

Where are the problems, as I will happily fix them.A mcmurray 03:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Anyone? Bueller? What are the tone problems? This article didn't seem that informal to me. Anyone?A mcmurray 16:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
I agree, there doesn't really seem to be a big tone problem, I removed the tag.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Pass edit

I'm passing the article after editing the flow a little in the lead paragraph. It seems to me to have all the essentials - good citing, reasonable coverage, decent grammar and structure, stability, and NPOV. The pictures are also quite nice. Ideas for improvement would be (perhaps) doing something about the architect's red-link or finding something else notable for a new section. --Meowist 06:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply