Sounds very marketing

edit

The whole article reads more like a piece of marketing than an article in an encyclopaedia. The interview section was more like a checklist of importance that trying to identify what was notable about any of the interviews. There is next to no value building a list of interviewed people (I am thinking "so what?"), the purpose of the article is not try to rank a person by importance or priority but to elucidate how the interviewing skills brought knowledge from them. I commented out that section until someone can build it into something is truly informative. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply