Talk:Drevlians
(Redirected from Talk:Drevlyans)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Cuchullain in topic Requested move 25 March 2015
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Move
editThis page should be moved back to Drevlians. That is a better name for it. The current name does not reflect English conventions at all.Johnpacklambert 21:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
200,000 in 1861?
edit200,000 Drevlyans were counted in the 1861 census? Sounds dubious. 1982vdven (talk) 03:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Name
edit- "Drevlians" (262)
- "Drevliani" (100)
- "Drevlyans" (93)
- "Drevlyani" (9)
Gbook hits.--Zoupan 16:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Requested move 25 March 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 14:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Drevlyans → Drevlians – Proper naming. As per above section. --Relisted. — Amakuru (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC) Zoupan 16:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support not that it greatly matters but the usage in Scholar is also at approaching a 2:1 ratio in favour. Even though it was an early tribe (and I could be wrong on this but), the "..yan" ending seems to suggest something from folklore. GregKaye 14:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Ngram (here) also suggests Drevlians is the predominant term. Ebonelm (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.