Talk:Multiple major in the United States

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: The article was moved to Double majors in the United States by Nimuaq. Steel1943 (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

---

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Double Majors → Double major (move) – The article is reviewed by myself for WP:AFCH and I plan to accept it, but I can not follow the accepting procedure if I can't move the article. There is already a redirect at the requested article name (double major) to the article Double degree, which is not the same as double major, as the article Double degree -ironically- explains. Nimuaq (talk) 14:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC) Nimuaq (talk) 14:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose this only deals with double majors in the US, so "double major" is not the appropriate title. Instead it should be called double majors in the United States. It can be linked to from double degree as a subarticle. Double major (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) should remain a redirect to "double degree". -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

• Comment. I'd move this to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Double Majors myself to start this discussion, but if I did that, it would compromise the material in the actual article that is being discussed. Nimuaq, I don't believe that trying to deem this a "technical move" is the correct way to proceed with getting this article moved to Double major ... since moving anything from the Wikipedia:Articles for creation section, especially when attempting to move over and already existing article or redirect, would almost always be assumed "controversial." Steel1943 (talk) 06:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

• Comment I share the same concerns with 65.92.180.137 as I already explained in my comment of the article before requesting the move. However, this is not yet an article, it doesn't have a talk page since it is a talk page itself. I saw this as a technical move since double major was always a redirect and the article it is redirected to, double degree, only states that it is not the same thing as double major. In any case, I'm moving the article to Double majors in the United States as suggested by 65.92.180.137. Nimuaq (talk) 10:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

CLARIFICATION NEEDED: In the section that begins "In addition, the ten most popular double major combinations are", the first following item is

   Business and Business

That doesn't seem to make sense and I feel this requires clarification. I also feel that the author probably meant something else like:

   Business Management and Business Law

Is this the forum for addressing such concerns, or should I just insert an in-text comment about this?

(Ehtech2000 (talk) 17:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Double majors in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019093322/http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/economists/zafar/DoubleMajors_Final.pdf to http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/economists/zafar/DoubleMajors_Final.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)