Talk:Dokkyo University

Weird first paragraph

The first paragraph sounds like a poorly written advertising pamphlet. Also, it would be nice to remove some of the names, or else to situate them in a meaningful context. Most readers are not familiar with any of the names in that paragraph, I would imagine. --Douglaspperkins (talk) 05:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dokkyo University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023172507/http://www.dokkyo.ac.jp:80/eg/index.htm to http://www.dokkyo.ac.jp/eg/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Added cites / trying to improve general quality of article

Hello everyone,

I have started improving the article, adding cites and removed the no-cites template in the partnering / exchange section just now, as I deem the citations sufficient at this point.

Hoping that you agree, all the best, Jörg--Ruhri Jörg (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

I have now also removed the remaining templates at the beginning of the article, hoping that its overall quality has lifted enough to justify that :)

All the best, --Ruhri Jörg (talk) 12:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)