Talk:Diana Thater
 | This article was nominated for deletion on January 3, 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Diana is notable edit
I do not understand your reasoning. There are many articles on Wikipedia about important contemporary visual artists. When I search Wikipedia I find entries for Bill Viola, Stan Douglas, Jeff Koons, Mike Kelley these are all Diana Thater's contemporaries. As it states in the first paragraph she has won a Guggenheim, been in three Whitney Bienneals, the Carnigie International and Many other museums. She is in the permenent collections of the Whitney Museum of American Art, The Tate in London and MOCA Los Angeles to name a few. She is considered extremely noteworthy in the contmeporary art world. I have linked her to many institutions that have their own Wikipedia pages. I really do not understand this judgement. I would aslo like to mentiuon that when I search say Johnny Cash, Keith richars, Sean Connery, Tom Crusie and on and on and on they all have wikipedia pages are biased against the visual arts? Just because you my not personally be familiar with it doesn't make it unimporatant.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddiesmom (talk • contribs) <!Eddiesmom (talk) 01:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Rest assured you're not alone in your confusion. Similar observations have been made at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Thater. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Diana Thater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060418030804/http://www.gf.org/05fellow.html to http://www.gf.org/05fellow.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)