Talk:Devadasu (1953 film)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Devadasu (1953 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Devadasu (1953 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Devadasu (1953 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 22:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC) May take up to a week...
- Lede
I don't think we need to know ,"with S. V. Ranga Rao, Seetarama Anjaneyulu, Dorasamy and Surabhi Kamalabai playing supporting roles. M. N. Nambiar, Sachu and Chandrakumari played these supporting roles in the Tamil version. " Generally we just say starring a couple of actors.
Done I have rewritten it. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)- Plot
Link zamindar again for clarity.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Production
- " and Surabhi Kamala Bai were selected t" -are these two different people?
- Done that is Surabhi Kamalabai, a single person. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Release
Telugu and Tamil should be linked in first instance further up in production and delinked here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Good job, solid article!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)