Error log edit

If I was a betting girl, I'd bet that no Free Press publisher or editor will ever edit this page to suppress the error log, as is the case with less professional publications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carla Bondicteuresse (talkcontribs) 16:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Talk Pages shouldn't be edited, but neither should they be used as message boards. The point is to talk about the article, not chart errors made by the paper. And please sign your posts. SixFourThree (talk) 14:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)SixFourThreeReply

Wikipedia mentioned in the paper edit

Today's front page has story about Wikipedia, "Everyman's Encyclopedia" (online at http://freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2006608020435). References Wikipedia users Michael Karazim and Michael Kestenbaum. Robert Happelberg 16:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Do we want to mention anything about Wikipedia being in the paper on the actual article page? --pevarnj (t/c/@) 17:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
No. I've been told the proper place for that is WP:PRESS. But it doesn't hurt to have it on this talk page, I think. Robert Happelberg 22:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

1987 of 1989? edit

The year for beginning joint operation is different then the Detroit News page. Which is it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.229.77.97 (talk) 23:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

mail server edit

I know this is a weird question, but does anyone know if the DFP has a webmail server/what it is? thanks 99.227.8.172 06:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

largest city newspaper in Gannett? edit

The article says that the Detroit Free Press is the "largest city newspaper in Gannett." How is that measured? If it's measured by circulation, the conventional standard, then the Arizona Republic is larger, as can be seen from the list that's linked from this page: http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2011/11/01/circulation_numbers_for_the_25_largest_newspapers/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.158.49 (talk) 15:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Detroit Free Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

How To Address Fake News by Detroit Free Press edit

How should fake news by this newspaper be addressed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:4101:56F0:BD36:37F0:6BAD:78E3 (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

By not mentioning the lies spewed out by the liar-in-chief — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.236.29 (talk) 12:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Changing the fair use photo in info box edit

I don't think it is correct to show a picture of an edition of the Sunday Free Press on the DFP page, as the Sunday Free Press is a joint venture with the Detroit News. It would be better to show simply the DFP logo or a picture of a daily editoin of the freepFulner (talk) 14:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Infobox picture should be changed edit

Thought I would post for something so substantial; if there is no discussion I'll probably "be bold" or whatever they say. Anyway, I don't think the picture in the infobox is a good portrayal of the Detroit Free Press. It is a highly unusual front cover, and while interesting, it does not give readers any idea of how the newspaper normally looks. It seems to me like this should be the purpose of the infobox image, and it should therefore be replaced with either an everyday issue of the newspaper or an issue with a notable headline but a typical layout. mossypiglet (talk) quote or something 01:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I quite agree. The big problem: do we have anything else (on en:WP or COMMONS) we can use? — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 02:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply