Talk:Deepak Chopra (Canada Post)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Shouldn't this article point out that this isn't the Deepak Chopra most people know??
Notability edit
Is there really a need for this article? Am I the only one who thinks this article does not fit the notability criteria of Wikipedia?--Soulparadox (talk) 02:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
More info needed edit
What nationality is this man? He is also on the board of directors for the Conference Board of Canada. Grandma Roses (talk) 02:25, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Recent changes edit
The content at issue is likely motivated by an ongoing labour dispute: Canada Post’s largest union, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers, will be legally in a position to go on strike tonight, Sunday August 28, at 11:59 p.m. Eastern. I’m in Communications with Canada Post, and am declaring that openly. The revisions do not meet Wikipedia’s fundamental principles about biographies of living persons: that entries be written from a neutral point of view and display an impartial tone and cite reliable published sources. The specific violations are: 1. Para 1, sentences 2, 3 and 4: “Deepak Chopra was kindly requested to resign by the new Trudeau government, but has refused, ensuring a legal battle to force his removal from the post he has dishonoured. It is understood the he was appointed by Harper to serve the interests of the Ex-Prime Minister. He is commonly termed as ‘The CEO gone Rogue.’”
i. “Dishonoured” is a hostile, subjective and unsupported assertion. ii. “Appointed by Harper to serve the interests of the Ex-Prime Minister.” This is unsupported and inaccurate. Mr. Chopra was appointed President and CEO after a successful global career in the postal industry and following a rigorous and competitive selection process which included “an international search conducted by a leading executive search firm.” [1] iii. The unsupported assertion that ‘CEO gone Rogue’ is a common descriptor is gross exaggeration and biased. The term is in fact the headline of a CUPW (union) news release: [2]