Talk:Daniel Ek
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evertigo? edit
Can't find anything about it on google. Is this a mis-hearing of Advertigo? Crasshopper (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Surname edit
Did his family's surname used to be something else before it was Ek? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
It looks like the Swedish surname Ek is derived from the Swedish word for "oak." 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Foaming detected edit
The aroma of sentences such as "Ek realized that money was meaningless without a project he was passionate about" betray the promotional tone of the text. The hammer will be coming down soon unless objections are raised. -The Gnome (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Covid vaccine disinformation controversy edit
That Neil Young referenced Daniel Ek is not noteworthy to Ek's page. Article referenced to support Rogan's "misinformation" doesn't actually support the claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.219.158.52 (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2022 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the "Net Worth" section: it is not really possible for the media to determine someone's net worth, you can only end up with bad and vague guesstimates. As indicated by the existing "original research" tag, what's written there currently is sloppy original research based on Spotify's stock valuation, not even a proper guess at his net worth. Endwise (talk) 03:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)