Sourced material removed edit

Sourced material removed without proper and reasoned explanation; reinstating.RudiLefkowitz (talk) 07:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

It was sourced to an article about a different Dan Schulman, as clearly explained in the edit summary. (Also, you reinstated vandalism, although I understand how that can happen sometimes). --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
But It was I who removed the mistaken source and the others I checked where goodRudiLefkowitz (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Schulman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed changes edit

The below is a series of proposed additions. They were submitted via ticket:2017050810001176 by an employee of Paypal, so there exists a conflict of interest here. I have not reviewed them and do not endorse them; I'm simply communicating them on the talk page with permission from the employee.

  • Dan is a member of the Verizon Board of Directors.
  • In 2018, Rutgers University bestowed upon Dan an honorary Doctor of Humane Letters degree. He also delivered the University’s 252nd anniversary commencement speech.
  • Dan was honored with the 2018 inaugural Center for Financial Services Innovation (CFSI) Financial Health Visionary Award for his commitment to improving the financial lives of people around the world.
  • The Council for Economic Education named Dan as its 2017 Visionary for promoting economic and financial literacy to create a better informed society.
  • The Brennan Center for Justice honored Dan with the 2017 Brennan Legacy Award for his contributions to democratize financial services and build a more inclusive global economy.


For reference: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Thanks for reviewing these. ~ Rob13Talk 01:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why doesn't PayPal do anything to the games that are fraudulent and get people's hopes up and they expect to finances from the games that they play and waste your edit

I do not understand why PayPal allow companies to use their name and not do anything about it if they are ripping people off any times and days have dropped how everything is so timed or rough I've been playing a game and PayPal is supposedly be the ones that the money to be paid through but the games none of them never pay out I'm a older gentleman and I was expecting this money to have for the holidays in my bills now I haven't got no money no nothing and I'm very upset because I think it's not right we waste our time playing these games all year long and then I go to cash out and I can't get my money 2603:6010:780B:38:1151:684:5FBB:7870 (talk) 15:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply