Talk:Cyclone Graham

Cyclone Graham has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 12, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 12, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Cyclone Graham dropped 163 millimetres (6.4 in) of rain at Telfer, Australia in one night, over half the community's annual average?

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Cyclone Graham is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Weather: Tropical / Southern Hemisphere Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Southern Hemisphere work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Graham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All references need publisher information.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Just one issue with the references that needs to be addressed before the article is promoted to GA status, so I am putting the article on hold to allow time to deal with this concern. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done. The references in question had the publisher as their author, so I switched it around. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks (my third GA today!) :-) –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic