Talk:Curve (band)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

KMFDM project edit

Anyone has info on the new project between Sascha Konietzko and Lucia Cifarelli of KMFDM and Dean? - mando 07:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Curve and Garbage edit

I've heard through various discussion boards accusations from critics about the band Garbage largely copying from Curve's music style. I don't know if this should be included in the article.


I think the article puts it excellently. Garbage were never, ever as dark as Curve. There's an almost industrial edge to some of Curve's best music, where Garbage are more of a rock band. Butch Vig may well have nicked some ideas (or been influenced by) Curve, but Garbage were always aimed much more at the pop mainstream than Curve ever were.

Personally I think Garbage are a pale imitation of Curve, sanitised for the masses, and Curve never got the recognition that they should have had. I suspect that's not a Neutral Point of View though. :) Depeche Mode proved that a dark, electronic sound can sell records, but for whatever reason, Curve never reached that level of success.

--Merlinme 16:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

"Aimed"? I don't think so. When they formed, they didn't even considered touring. They just happened to become popular. Duke Ericson (Garbage member) said he's considers Garbage a pop group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.98.118 (talk) 16:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

My changes edit

If anyone objects to anything I'm doing (in terms of style) with Curve stuff at the moment, do say. (Obviously if something is 'wrong' – like genres for some of the albums – then feel free to fix yourself). Zetetic Apparatchik 23:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

(Suggested new discography layout, at least for albums.)


Songs on Adventures that have no guitar edit

In the article is says that on The New Adventures Of there are songs without guitar. I keep listening to it and can't figure which songs don't have guitar. Do they mean "Answers", because that has guitar on it. Maybe this should be changed?

Baroqueswinger 19 August 2007. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Baroqueswinger (talkcontribs) 06:19:46, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Template edit

I have added a discography template on the article; let me know what you think of it and if it works well. It's my first template so I'm open to constructive criticism. Thanks. The Fly (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dean Garcia redirect / SPC ECO edit

noticed that searching for "dean garcia" redirected to here, which is fine for obvious reasons. but nothing about his latest project SPC ECO is mentioned here. shouldn't there be a post-curve section? SPC ECO is phenomenal btw...

http://www.myspace.com/spceco

Simmering chaos (talk) 07:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit: went ahead and made some minor changes to the entry (post-curve and the footnote). feel free to add more info :)

Simmering chaos (talk) 07:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality edit

Um. Apparently the neutrality of this article has been disputed. Apparently very quietly and invisibly. WTF, anyone? Zetetic Apparatchik (talk) 23:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, on the basis that this disputation appears to be continuing in a very ethereal fashion, I'll be removing the Neutrality template and attempt to refrain from calling anyone a moron for putting it there in the first place. Zetetic Apparatchik (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dean Garcia's project band names edit

This is to note that the band names include the word "The" as part of their official names and therefore the word should remain capitalized.

"The Black Holes" [1][2][3]

"The Chronologic" [4][5][6]

and "The Secret Meeting" [7][8]

  1. ^ Side-Line Music Magazine. "Dean Garcia (Curve) signs The Black Holes / SPC ECO / Morpheme to XD Records". Side-Line Music Magazine. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
  2. ^ Discogs. "The Black Holes". Discogs. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
  3. ^ The Black Holes. "Stone Cold Baby". The Black Holes (Official) via Bandcamp. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
  4. ^ Side-Line Music Magazine. "The Chronologic debut with digital EP". Side-Line Music Magazine. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
  5. ^ XD Records. "XD Records (Official) on Facebook". XD Records (Official) on Facebook. Retrieved 4 August 2011. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  6. ^ Discogs. "The Chronologic". Discogs. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
  7. ^ "The Secrety Meeting (Official Site)". The Secret Meeting. Retrieved 4 August 2011.
  8. ^ Discogs. "The Secret Meeting". Discogs. Retrieved 4 August 2011.

--KDSRRGurl (talk) 21:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Curve discography edit

During the last days, I improved a lot the Curve's Wikipedia page (it looked like that before my edits). I added also a lot of info on the discography section. I checked the info but there could be some small errors. Someone please check/compare again the discography with the main source curve-online.co.uk. Deepblue1 (talk) 23:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please check www.curve-online.co.uk against the reliable sources criteria. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
If you judge everything mechanically, you will not go anywhere. The source is reliable. Plus it's already on the internet for over 10 years and it's endorsed by the band. If you can find on the net a more reliable source about Curve, let me know. So far, this is the best one. Deepblue1 (talk) 15:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
It's a fansite. As such it fails the criteria and cannot be referenced here on Wikipedia. WesleyDodds (talk) 23:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
If it's a fan site, what's the problem? The one who edited the site had all interest to keep everything correct (because he's a fan and he's dedicated), compared to usual sites that don't care about the band in special (and I've seen a lot of errors on so-called serious sites). Plus being a fan, he gathered all info he needed about the band during the years. I'd rather trust a fan that wrote almost all that info BEFORE Wikipedia even existed, rather than a journalist that probably copied everything from Wikipedia...
Also from here: "Fan sites are generally not considered reliable. 'However, exceptions can apply' - some fan sites contain scans of small extracts of old newspaper and magazine articles, and these may be the most convenient way to cite facts based off the original published content. Be careful, however, as these scans may actually be a copyright violation, which must not be used to cite facts in an article. The opinions of a fan site owner or owners are generally not reliable - anyone can set up a web site and claim to be part of an "editorial team" without establishing a widely known reputation for fact checking and content control".
I didn't reference the opinion(s) of the site's owner, but exact info (like discography). If you're really so worried about this fan site, check the Discogs page instead. At Sites, you'll see this fan site listed. That proves its relevance. Deepblue1 (talk) 11:05, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Discogs isn't considered a reliable source either, by the way, as it consists of user-generated content. WesleyDodds (talk) 13:00, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
If Discogs is not a reliable source, then what source(s) people use when add discography on artists pages? Give me an example. Deepblue1 (talk) 19:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

external links edit

Wikipedia is not here to provide a link farm. There is no need for a link wall to all the the bands social media sites as they do not meet the criteria for external links "it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic. No page should be linked from a Wikipedia article unless its inclusion is justifiable according to this guideline and common sense. The burden of providing this justification is on the person who wants to include an external link." -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • These links are good because they're related directly to the band. No solid reason to remove them. They don't stay in your path, isn't? Deepblue1 (talk) 10:41, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
"directly related" is not sufficient per WP:EL there must be value add specific reason. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curve (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Curve (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:16bit (band) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply