Talk:Cumulus Networks

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Request for non-primary source - not possible

edit

On the article someone added a 'non-primary source required' at the line: Cumulus claims that its Switch operating system is different from other network Operating Systems because it IS Linux and offers the entirety of the Linux experience

But this is a quote from the vendor ('Cumulus claims') which is per definition (only) source by themselves. Otherwise it could have been mentioned as a fact (even though this is an opinion - but then at least it could say 'network administrators say...' or something; but here it is clear that it is 'cumulus claims' - so either the sentence should be removed or the request for non-primary resource should be removed. I did remove the request for npr : but feel free to remove entire sentence if you (whoever that is) thinks that statement is advertising. (I'm not from Cumulus nor a big supporter of it....). Cheers. Tonkie (talk) 16:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cumulus Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply