Talk:Crumb (film)

Comics: Films Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Film: Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[National Society of Film Critics Award for Best Non-Fiction Film#1990s|Best Non-Fiction Film]] The anchor (#1990s) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Removed edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

i removed the part about crumb not liking the film. in the interview with zwigoff listed as a link, zwigoff says that crumb generally liked the film, but found it difficult to comment on as it was all about his own life. This had been misinterpreted as Crumb not liking the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.79.134.154 (talk) 05:11, 28 August 2006

Turns out Crumb and his wife drew a "scathing" cartoon in the New Yorker magazine about the film, as noted in a review in ==Reception==. That may have contributed to the above notion. --Lexein (talk) 11:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

References to use edit

Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.

Nuetzel, Eric J. (2001). "Over-Exposure: Terry Zwigoff's Crumb". In Gabbard, Glen O (ed.). Psychoanalysis and Film. International Journal of Psychoanalysis Key Paper Series. Karnac Books. ISBN 1855752751.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Erik (talk • contribs) 19:28, 2 November 2010

Best Cinematography? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Two sources say Crumb got "Best Cinematography" at Sundance 1995, but there's nothing to that effect at sundance.org. So I tagged the claim "dubious". I suppose "unconfirmed" is better... --Lexein (talk) 11:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

"Production" Section: What exactly was the "clarification"? edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The idea is "set-up" in the Article, that Roger Ebert somehow said that Robert Crumb was reluctant to make the film, but that Terry Zwigoff threatened to "kill himself" if the movie wasn't made.

"Ebert later clarified this in the audio commentary of the film's Criterion Collection re-release."

But the Article fails to mention exactly what this "clarification" was. If the Article is going to include this bit of trivia (and I think it should, as it's interesting) then it should clearly detail the whole situation. Exactly how did the misunderstanding/mistake take place, and how was the situation "clarified". Either tell the whole story, or leave the whole thing out.

2605:6000:6947:AB00:8CD2:BCA9:AF26:C987 (talk) 07:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic