Talk:Croatia–United States relations

Neutrality

I placed the POV tag when creating the article because it is pasted from a US government website. Because this comes from a US govt source it may not be neutral, but I don't have the expertise to judge. (Hopefully others that know more will simply remove the tag if they think the article looks okay.) Mangostar (talk) 00:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Neutrality no. 2

Second the above - POV re-added. The neutrality of the article definitely needs to be assessed. While it's reasonable to assume this subject matter might have an increased focus on a U.S. perspective, the article repeatedly cites the U.S. as being one of the most important partners to Croatia across military and economic relations. This precludes the importance of a much more dynamic economic and political landscape in the context of greater Europe and Croatia's place as a relatively new member state to the European Union. Consequently, a first-time reader may get a disproportionate representation of the nature of Croatia's relations with the U.S. Discuss? Mz. 110.20.97.221 (talk)

Hy, can you please eleborate why do you belive that this article represents POV? Mangostar put POV tage 8 years ago because he literally copy and pasted text from US Governemnt web pages which was removed and rewritten later, all except this sentence in intro: "American engagement in Croatia is aimed at fostering a democratic, secure, and market-oriented society that will be a strong US partner in Euro-Atlantic institutions. Bilateral relations between the two countries are described as very strong.". You say: "the article repeatedly cites the U.S. as being one of the most important partners to Croatia across military and economic relations.". "Repeatedly", however there are two sentances that say this: 1. US is the most important Croatian military partner., which is corret since it has been said by Chief of General Staff of the Croatian Armed Forces Drago Lovrić; 2. Economic relations between Croatia and US are very good., and this is true, because US is the 1st most important Croatian trade partner in North America, and 8th in the world, so relations are not great, but "good", as stated in source. Everything else mentioned are basiclly facts that are supported with appropriate citations. In addition, it is well known that US and EU are indeed Croatia's most important partners. I look forward to your response, greetings United Union (talk) 10:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

POV template removed since it has been more then a week, and it is still not clear what the neutrality issue is, no satisfactory explanation has been given, and also because there is the absence of any discussion about the (alleged) issue. United Union (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Croatia–United States relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304103510/http://www.eucom.mil/mission/the-region/croatia to http://www.eucom.mil/mission/the-region/croatia
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120731051206/http://www.dubrovnik.hr/novost_clanak.php?id=1308 to http://www.dubrovnik.hr/novost_clanak.php?id=1308
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917184259/http://americanambassadors.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Publications.article&articleid=141 to http://www.americanambassadors.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Publications.article&articleid=141
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728065540/http://www.osaarchivum.org/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/98-3-205.shtml to http://www.osaarchivum.org/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/98-3-205.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130720055631/http://nato.hr/galerije/clinton-posjetila-zagreb to http://www.nato.hr/galerije/clinton-posjetila-zagreb

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 14 August 2017 (UTC)