Talk:Crew Dragon C205

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 15 January 2021 by reviewer Sam-2727 (talk · contribs).

Spaceflight: SpaceX working group Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by SpaceX working group.

Proposed merge of Crew Dragon with Crew Dragon C205 edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

None of the cited sources at Crew Dragon C205 mention "C205" in their text, leading me to believe that this article should be merged to another Crew Dragon article. Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test may also be a valid target. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Don't merge I just added two references (^[1]^[2]) where the serial number is mentioned to be C205 for the capsule which completed the in flight abort test (IFA). And with the only reasoning for a merge that there was no specific mention from the sources I do not think that the article should be merged. Terasail ^[✉] 20:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Even with those sources, I'm not sure that the subject meets WP:GNG. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I guess it is not as notable as other space capsules and articles however, I still think it meets GNG. Other user responses will decide this one as I can definitely see your perspective aswell. Terasail ^[✉] 20:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Ralph, Eric. "SpaceX's plans for a reusable Dragon spacecraft fleet detailed by Gwynne Shotwell". Teslarati. Retrieved January 15, 2021.
^ Atkinson, Ian. "SpaceX conducts successful Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test". Nasa Spaceflight. Retrieved January 15, 2021.

Keep - there's enough here to pass GNG for the individual capsule's notability. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Certainly don't merge it with Crew Dragon which is a redirect to SpaceX Dragon 2#Crew Dragon. Neither the redirect nor the redirect target are the right place to discuss individual vehicles. The alternative to "keep" would be "delete". --mfb (talk) 01:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] Ralph, Eric. "SpaceX's plans for a reusable Dragon spacecraft fleet detailed by Gwynne Shotwell". Teslarati. Retrieved January 15, 2021.

[2] Atkinson, Ian. "SpaceX conducts successful Crew Dragon In-Flight Abort Test". Nasa Spaceflight. Retrieved January 15, 2021.

[1]

[2]