Talk:Craven

(Redirected from Talk:Craven (disambiguation))
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Favonian in topic Requested move 2 December 2021

Requested move 2 December 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: mover per request. Favonian (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply


– No clear primary topic per views[[1]], target is per WP:UKDISTRICTS and GeoNames. Google results are mixed between the district and dictionary meaning. Craven County, North Carolina gets 737 views and has a higher population (102,139) than the district (57,142) and although US counties include "County" in the name it is shown on GeoNames search as just "Craven". Craven A gets more views (1,393) but again may not just be "Craven" commonly. There is Craven in the Domesday Book which apparently covered a larger area and the current district don't seem like that much of a broad-concept article anyway and there is also Craven (Bradford ward) in West Yorkshire. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Support In addition to the pageview data, the clickstream stats also point to there being no ptopic. Last month 92 readers navigated from Craven to Craven (disambiguation) - it's tied for being the most common outgoing pageview. Assuming almost all of those "lost" readers arrived at the page via search (rather than clicking a link in another article), we're looking at a little more than 25% of "Craven" searchers being taken to the wrong page (92/(1300*.26)). Which is pretty bad. Compare that to another borderline ptopic, Madonna, where the disambiguation page isn't even in the top 20 most frequent outgoing clicks. Colin M (talk) 23:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per all of the above - no primary topic even if you completely discount the dictionary definition. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 19:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.