Talk:Countess Eloise of Orange-Nassau
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Style of countess Eloise edit
In the Netherlands, aristocrats with the rank of a count(ess) do have the prefix "hooggeboren heer/vrouwe" ("highborn lord/lady") and not "Her Excellency".
The full name is: Eloise Sophie Beatrix Laurence van Oranje-Nassau van Amsberg.
The title and predicate are: Countess of Orange-Nassau, Jonkvrouwe van Amsberg.
The prefix is: Highborn lady.
Why is the Countess Eloise not a Princess of The Netherlands ? Her father's marriage was approved by the government and its normal for male-descendents of Sovereign of enjoy the style of royal highness and the title of princess. In fact the Queen Juliana allowed Princess Margariet's children (female-line descendent) to be styled as princess and with style of Highness.
Picture edit
What does the countess look like
Objection to deletion edit
I object to this deletion due to the importance of this person: she is a full member of the Dutch Royal House and 6th person in the line of succession to the Dutch Throne. She is definitely not some sort of marginal person. Demophon (talk) 03:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Countess Eloise of Orange-Nassau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110125170708/http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/english/Monarchy/Succession_to_the_throne/Current_line_of_succession.html to http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/english/Monarchy/Succession_to_the_throne/Current_line_of_succession.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130203062538/http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/globale-paginas/taalrubrieken/english/information-abdication/ to http://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/globale-paginas/taalrubrieken/english/information-abdication/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)