Talk:Corpse road

Need further explanation

"Burial rights" is tossed about in this article like the rest of the world is supposed to know what that means. My first impression is that it refers to the right of a family to bury its dead, but from context this is obviously not the meaning intended. There is no Wikipedia article on burial rights. Please define region-specific terms in the article if you are going to use them. 71.204.204.249 13:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Burial rights

Having a cemetery under the control of a given church would mean that all of the 'income' from a funeral would go to that church. When the population expanded and more churches were built it was not surprising that a natural reluctance to 'lose control' of funerals developed. Such an iniquity was not sustainable in the long term and the right of burial - having their own cemetery - was eventually granted to new churches. This is my understanding of the situation. Rosser 21:58, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

"Shakespeare's Prose"?

H'mmm...didn't know about much prose attributed to Shakespeare. Would someone please tell us about it, or change the reference? 70.153.159.70 (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Corpse-candle and its kin

Till recently, Corpse-candle pointed here, Corpse fire and Corpse candle to Will-o'-the-wisp, and Corpse light to St. Elmo's fire. I've uniformised them all to Will-o'-the-wisp but perhaps they should all point here instead... 4pq1injbok (talk) 03:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. I've changed Corpse candle (and its hyphen/case variants) to point here since it fits better thematically imo. Corpse fire should similarly be redirected to here, although I haven't done so yet. I'm not sure about Corpse light--it'd need research to determine the most suitable redirect target. --92.6.206.226 (talk) 19:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Original Research

It would help if the suggested 'OR' was highlighted. I started this article in my early days and refs sometimes got split up. But no 'OR' added to my memory. Rosser Gruffydd 20:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality of References and Article

I question the quality of the references on which this article relies. There are two blogs (9,18); a dead link of baffling relevance (5); another dead link to a website on ley lines (14); and three to a ley lines website (4,6,12). There is also a photograph of a tourist information sign (2) which, though of probably better quality than the foregoing, is not exactly something held in the British Library. The "External Links" comprise a ley lines website, a Wikibooks page, a blog, a fellwalking site (possibly a blog) with adverts and inaccurate information about the Wasdale/Eskdale coffin road, and lastly, a dead link.

Corpse roads are real geographic and historical entities, particularly in Britain. It is disappointing, therefore, that this article has very little connection with any serious studies on this subject. The "Origins" section is not supported by the only reference provided (and the quality of that reference is questioned above) and, as I understand it, this section is largely incorrect. The rest of the article is overwhelmed by stories about superstitions. There are numerous corpse roads across Britain, many of which are walked today by hill walkers and the like. I am sure many would look to Wikipedia for some real information on the subject - but leave empty handed.

If any article was ever begging for a proper rewrite, this is it.

ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Corpse road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090909090653/http://www.pauldevereux.co.uk:80/new/html/body_leylines.html to http://www.pauldevereux.co.uk/new/html/body_leylines.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corpse road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704121228/http://www.bali-travel-life.com/bali-religion.html to http://www.bali-travel-life.com/bali-religion.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)