POV

edit

Parts of this article are written in the third person, so the article reads like a brochure. I would have put an advertising template on the article, but it's a non-profit organisation. Correct me if I am wrong with my choice of actions. Black-Velvet 09:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I added an advert template. I know this seems harsh for an article about a charity but it's fairly blatant. If anyone can think of a more appropriate template feel free to replace. --Jkspratt 03:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


The advert tag was removed without explanation or any improvements being made. The article looks like it was either copied from Concern's own literature or written by someone working for the organisation. I've added a cleanup tag instead. This article isn't of sufficient quality and I don't know enough about the charity to re-write myself. --Jkspratt 22:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyvios

edit

I have removed a number of copyvio sections pulled straight from Concern Worldwide's website. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Clean-up

edit

This page was not of sufficient quality so I’ve edited it to make it more neutral. I’ve added citations and removed the parts that were in the third person. I feel this addresses the issues above so I've removed the tags. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariel lydiaAriel lydia (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2011 (UTC) (talkcontribs) 11:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Concern Worldwide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Concern Worldwide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

News story from 2016 - "Concern Worldwide charity accidentally charges up to 100 times the amount donors pledged"

edit

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/charity-concern-worldwide-donors-100-times-a7007846.html

"Concern Worldwide charity accidentally charges up to 100 times the amount donors pledged 'I've been charged £800 instead of £8. I don't even make that much in a month' Independent Staff Saturday 30 April 2016 09:11 BST" 2A00:23C5:5674:DD00:6D13:5363:788B:28EB (talk) 20:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply