Talk:Comparison of programming languages (associative array)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2001:638:807:20D:811C:1DE9:F2A0:37BB in topic Section D - source does not support claim

Trailing comma

edit

The trailing comma in constructors is only mentioned in Lua, not in other languages that support it, like Ruby and newer versions of Javascript. Seems a bit inconsistent.--87.162.50.32 (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

VHDL

edit

I don't see VHDL listed qesdunn (talk) 14:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Jython

edit

I would like to see a reference to Jython ( http://www.jython.org/ ). Afaik it maps Java objects into Python. --80.143.109.31 (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Comparison of programming languages (mapping). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 22 May 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed request. Number 57 21:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


Comparison of programming languages (mapping)Comparison of programming languages (associative arrays) – See main article Associative array Ushkin N (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC) -- Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comparison of programming languages (associative array). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Section D - source does not support claim

edit

In the section on D, it is claimed that the built-in associative arrays "are implemented as a chaining hash table with binary trees" and [1] is given as source. However, that site does not give any implementation details - D language specification never does.

By the way, the up-to-date version of that site would be [2].

Best --2001:638:807:20D:811C:1DE9:F2A0:37BB (talk) 15:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply