Talk:Coleridge (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Samee in topic Requested move 11 April 2018
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move 11 April 2018 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved and Coleridge redirected to Samuel Taylor Coleridge. (non-admin closure)  samee  converse  11:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply



ColeridgeColeridge (disambiguation) – In the same manner that Wordsworth redirects to William Wordsworth, Keats to John Keats and Dickens to Charles Dickens, so should Coleridge redirect to Samuel Taylor Coleridge who is most frequently referenced by his surname.     Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 05:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Across passage of centuries (and putting aside such mononyms as Erasmus, Paracelsus or Molière), the historical surnames already existing as direct links — Shakespeare, Descartes, Pushkin, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Chekhov, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, etc — speak for themselves. We know who they are and each of us can make a decision based on that knowledge.    Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 07:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oh, another list of names. Still no evidence related to Coleridge. -- Netoholic @ 07:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Seems like a pretty obvious primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, appears to be the only ubiquitous name-holder and much more prominent than the others. Most of the other entries get very little page views, only his children get a decent amount and they are still dwarfed by Coleridge's article. —Xezbeth (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per both the nom and discussion reasoning. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.