Talk:Codex Mendoza

List

How about moving the list to a general article Aztec codices? Anyone opposed?--Rockero 08:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

No opposition here. I think it's a great idea. I've been linking the various codices I've run across in the articles in preparation for a write-up. Madman 12:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

I went ahead and created the Aztec codices article. So far, it contains descriptions for 2 codices, the links from this article, and a few other links I discovered. Madman 14:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Image (Incorrectly?) Labeled as "First Page"

The main image shown in the article is labeled as the first page of the Codex Mendoza, but isn't it actually a cropped version of folio 2 recto? I haven't personally seen the Codex or a facsimile--perhaps this is the first printed page? Folio 2 recto appears in the image gallery and is labeled as such. The main image has cut off the bottom portion of 2 recto (which is fine by me, as long as its label implies this) and is, of course, actually the third page in conventional page counts. I suggest correcting this label to something along the lines of "City" or "Altepetl of Tenochtitlan as depicted in the Codex Mendoza, f.2r" or "...as depicted on page 3 (f.2r) of the Codex Mendoza". KAPet (talk) 16:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Additional Clarifications

Would anyone be opposed to either a. expanding the labels in the gallery or b. creating sub-sections for particularly enlightening pages of the Codex with more in-depth analysis?

Examples of Possible Clarifications to Include:

• Explicitly stating that the eagle in the center of folio 2 recto is a reference to the origin story of Tenochtitlan
• Noting the dating(?)which appears in the border around folio 2 recto (I think that's what those pictograms are, but I'm not very well-versed in Aztec/Nahuatl glyphs, so I am by no means certain about this--Anyone an expert in this area?)
• Briefly explaining the Aztec convention of depicting conquests in pictograms (fallen temple with place name)
• Explaining the Aztec numbering system on the tribute lists (or at least link to an article that does), and maybe using one SUCH page as a detailed example outlining the amounts of each item shown, i.e. X number feathers above the pictogram for honey indicates X number jars of honey total?

I think such explanations would greatly improve this article. What do others think? KAPet (talk) 16:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Codex Mendoza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160109154756/http://codice.manuvo.com:80/inicio.php?lang=spanish to http://codice.manuvo.com/inicio.php?lang=spanish

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Codex Mendoza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://codice.manuvo.com/inicio.php?lang=spanish
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004131630/http://treasures.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/the-treasures-exhibition to http://treasures.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/the-treasures-exhibition
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111004131630/http://treasures.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/the-treasures-exhibition to http://treasures.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/the-treasures-exhibition

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Discovered: "they like chicken"

I'm assuming "discovered: they liked chicken" is vandalism? 71.191.88.76 (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)