 | Codex Boreelianus has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 21, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that only a few manuscripts have fallen into such unworthy hands as Codex Boreelianus (pictured)? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment
editI came to this article from the Main Page, but as a non-expert I found myself confronted with a huge wall of untranslated greek. If the aim of that section (under Textual variants (against Textus Receptus) and Against K) is to demonstrate the differences, couldn't we just say verbally that there are 79 differences? If the aim is to allow experts to read and comprehend the differencesm could we have a translation for the rest of us? 82.17.208.52 (talk) 08:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)