Talk:Chrystabel Leighton-Porter
 | A fact from Chrystabel Leighton-Porter appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 August 2008, and was viewed approximately 4,415 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Jane and her husband Arthur" edit
Link number 9 to the Argus is confusing. The article there begins by talking about the fictional character "Jane" but then indicates she is a real person, married to Arthur, Chrystabel Leighton-Porter's son. Is the reference to a 2002 funeral about a completely different "Arthur"? Or did Chrystabel Leighton-Porter's son Arthur marry someone called Jane who worked for the Daily Mirror? The reference used for his death-date seems dubious, especially as he was born in 1957 and so would only have been 45 years old or so in 2002. 2.31.164.72 (talk) 11:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Which 36th Division? edit
Which 36th Division was allegedly inspired to do the advancing? DYK mentioned the 36th (Ulster) Division or something, but their page only mentions WWI, so something's amiss or something's missing. Jason A. Recliner (talk) 06:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- On further investigation [1] refers to the 36th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) in Burma - but the Telegraph article sourced in the article [2] refers to 6 miles in Normandy... Anyone know which is right? Tony (talk) 17:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Neutral tone restored edit
Not much of a debate needed as someone had gone a bit over the top but I think it is OK now so unless anyone can spot something I've missed I will remove the NPOV in a week Thruxton (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chrystabel Leighton-Porter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080223104604/http://archives.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/UK/12/08/death.jane/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/UK/12/08/death.jane/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090730204136/http://archive.theargus.co.uk/2003/1/13/142783.html to http://archive.theargus.co.uk/2003/1/13/142783.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)