Talk:Christopher Cradock
Latest comment: 16 years ago by 138.88.133.164 in topic Expansion
 | Christopher Cradock has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christopher Cradock article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Name edit
The correct spelling is Cradock, as per (eg.) the 1911 Britannica Bastie 21:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Expansion edit
I believe more should be added to this article, as right now, sufficient credit is not given to Cradock for requesting the Defense and that here, he is displayed almost as being willing to enter the battle ("decided to engage" vs. "reluctantly engaged"). --138.88.133.164 (talk) 14:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)