Talk:Christian Congregation (Restoration Movement)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Amakuru in topic Requested move 17 July 2016
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Requested move 17 July 2016 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Matter resolved — Amakuru (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
The Christian Congregation → Christian Congregation – "The" is not needed. tahc chat 22:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Omni Flames (talk) 08:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. The definite article is needed to distinguish this article's topic from that of Christian congregations in general, of which this is not the only one. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 00:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- The MOS discourages use of "The" for this purpose. Christian Congregation is clearly distinguished by Christian congregations in general by the difference in capitalization. In fact the current Christian Congregation page does not even have a disambiguation link to Local church or or any other "Christian congregations in general" type article. tahc chat 15:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Tahc is right that capitalization distinguishes it from "Christian congregations" generically, and that the MOS discourages using "the" to do this. Jujutsuan (Please notify with {{re}} talk | contribs) 18:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
NOTE: This discusion should be moot, since I found that the bodies at Christian Congregation (Pentecostal) to be unrelated to the Christian Congregation (Restoration Movement). This makes two groups with similar/same names, and thus the even greater need to disambiguate them from each other. tahc chat 18:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your attention to detail. I support the making the distinction clear, of course. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 12:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.