Talk:Chris Agee

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Revamp? edit

Wondering what the status with this article is? Will it be kept or deleted? If kept, and if people are interested in a revamp, please write something on my talk page, and I'll take a look into possibly doing it. Some of my other projects: United States Congress (revamp Sep 2010), Priscilla Martel, Broadband mapping in the United States, Two-party system, Gar Waterman, others.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are apparently confused by the above {{oldafdfull}}. The result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Agee was delete. Shortly after the AfD expired I've questioned the rationale of the closing admin, see User_talk:Kevin/Archive_7#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Agee. The article was restored and improved. Feel free to work on it. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:16, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I may get to it, possibly, but in a while. Tell me your thoughts about the future direction of the article. What is good? What needs expanding? How would you like to see it?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I think the article is in a good shape. I have some concerns with the unreferenced (and superfluous?) claims in the section Chris_Agee#Family_Background. Possible COI? --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:59, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
If you're happy with it, basically, then I won't disturb anything. I've found other projects; I might revamp the article Dating. I agree with your view about family background being superfluous but you're in a better position than me to improve it. I bought Agee's book Next to Nothing -- poems.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Less is more edit

My concern is that there is so much information here which perhaps only a very narrow audience might possibly be interested in; for the rest of us, it looks as if this article is trying too hard, so it makes Agee appear unprofessional and the article's length (in proportion to the subject's notability and fame) is way out of proportion. The overall effect is to make the subject seem dubious, and undermine believability. btw I read one of his poetry books and reviewed it on Amazon; interesting stuff. --Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chris Agee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Chris Agee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply