Additional references edit

Potentially useful references:

Regards, --benlisquareTCE 06:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with 2016 South Korean political scandal edit

Short article containing only material pertaining to 2016 South Korean political scandal. In addition, given that it is a BLP dealing primarily with accusations of the subject, increased traffic and scrutiny should result in less change of BLP policy violations. Melmann(talk) 16:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Doesn't seem like Choi Soon-sil should be merged with 2016 South Korean political scandal. One article is about a person and one article is about an event in which that person is involved. Additionally, the scandal page redirects to "Choi Soon-sil gate;" I don't see any sources using that name and it's very Americentric anyway. Oppose the merge. WiiWillieWiki 20:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose merge, if any thing the 2016 South Korean political scandal should be merged with the Choi Soon-sil article. It is still early days and who knows how big this story will develop. Inter&anthro (talk) 20:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose merge. I think both the person and the event are separately notable. The bio article can cover her life, and the scandal article - well, the scandal. Btw, do note that term "Choi Soon-sil gate" is used in sources, ex. [1]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose merge, the whole investigation and scandal is only after being discovered. I believe this will expand. People don't know the extent of Park Guen-hye's involvement with the entire story. There is no point merging a article about a person and a political scandal together. CnocBride (talk) 15:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Support There is not enough here to justify a separate article. This is mostly just repetition of the fast-changing scandal article. If you take out the repetitive information on the scandal, you are left with a single sentence ("Choi Soon-sil (born 23 June 1956) is the daughter of a South Korean Shamanistic cult leader, Choi Tae-min."). The topics are not different; she is only notable because of the scandal. Make this article a subsection of the scandal article and redirect this title to that subsection. When the subsection grows big enough, then create a separate page. A separate article is premature. Further this is a fast-moving scandal now. Having separate articles risk one becoming outdated. Better keep one article that can be regularly updated.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 14:48, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - It's a huge scandal. -- Kanghuitari (talk) 06:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jailed edit

According to NPR today (1 Nov. 2016), Choi is in prison but has not been charged.Kdammers (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Picture edit

As of the time of this edit I'd say that the picture is pretty poor. It is obviously a snapped photo of the subject hiding their face, a better picture should be loaded instead if possible. Thanks. Inter&anthro (talk) 14:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Image has been deleted. See commons. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Pseudo-Christian? edit

What is a Pseudo-Christian? Looks more like someone's personal opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.206.228.249 (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

It resembles the rituals of the Christian, yet they are fakes deceive people. Freewillforever (talk) 10:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

3 different names? edit

Just curious, but does anyone know why/how she has a different "Korean name", "birth name", and a "legal name"? Zeniff (talk) 05:52, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

To hide her true self and try to obliviate her past Freewillforever (talk) 10:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Do you have a source for that, Freewillforever? WiiWillieWiki 05:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

"최서원은 왜 아직 최순실로 불릴까". KBS News (in Korean). Seoul. 2016-11-01. Sawol (talk) 06:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply