Talk:China Network Television

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal edit

The two article are overlap, the service is commonly just known as China Network Television.

Requested move 10 December 2017 edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved — Amakuru (talk) 14:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

China Network Television → CCTV.com – This website is renamed back to CCTV.com now. Dabao qian (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. No valid rationale provided (or likely). See wp:official names, which explains the policy which all noms are urged in several places to read before raising an RM. WP:NAMECHANGES may be relevant but from experience with similar baseless RMs it's highly unlikely. Andrewa (talk) 00:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic